Measurement Blog | Simplifying & Refining Quality Measures to Reduce Burden

June 15, 2020

In this current day and age of electronic health records (EHRs) it is hard to remember a time when all health records were maintained on paper. Clinical data was collected as a part of a time limited study or a sample, and full population data was almost unheard of. Some of the earliest population-based quality measures were built with administrative claims data. These types of process measures were useful for screening or medication adherence measures based on billable information, however there was limited clinical data for understanding health outcomes. Data collection was and continues to be very labor intensive.

Transition to EHRs Brings New Opportunity to Reduce Burden

A little over a decade ago, MNCM was in its beginning stages of developing new measures and its new direct data submission (DDS) process. At that time, about 40% of Minnesota clinics were still on paper records. It was not uncommon to turn to the progress note for a piece of information that could not be obtained any other way. Fast forward ten years and about 99% of Minnesota clinics are now on EHRs. Clinics have gained proficiency in extraction and query capabilities, and along with that have come more requests for timely clinical data. There has been an increasing emphasis on clinical data and outcome measures that have the most potential to improve population health. It is no longer practical to manually abstract even a few pieces of information from the EHR as a part of ongoing quality measurement.

Guiding Principles for a New Approach

For this reason, we need guiding principles to reduce burden for medical groups, support automation of quality measurement, and enable more timely feedback to inform quality improvement efforts. These principles will be used in implementing MNCM’s new PIPE system of data collection, and will also inform MNCM’s future measure development decisions.

For existing measures, elements will be considered for retention when identified by a standardized set of codes, i.e. codable. Currently, most elements that are not codable are contained in exclusions or exceptions. A few of the exceptions, after guideline or medication evolution, no longer made sense and needed a little bit of tuning up.

Future measures developed and stewarded by MNCM must include:

  • Reliable (and consistently used) codes for all components of the measure construct.
  • A consideration for a more inclusive measure with no exclusions.
  • Exclusions and exceptions need to be present in a significant percentage of the population (i.e., 5%).
  • If an exclusion or exception is rare (and codable), there needs to be a strong justification for including it.
  • PRO-based measures should rely on a validated PRO tool with strong psychometrics, validated cut-points and scoring for desired outcomes, and the tool should be free for clinical use & multiple modes of administration.

With these principles in mind, MNCM has refined the specifications for several existing measures.

Learn More

by Collette Cole, Clinical Measure Developer, MN Community Measurement


Posted in Blog

Recent Posts

By Jessica Donovan April 29, 2026
MN Community Measurement (MNCM) has released two new reports highlighting the state’s health care performance: Health Care in Minnesota: Summary Report on Quality, Disparities, and Cost and Health Care in Minnesota: Health Care Quality Leaders . Together, these reports provide a comprehensive analysis of 2024 data, examining trends in health care quality, disparities, and costs, while also recognizing medical group quality leaders and those demonstrating meaningful improvement. These reports, based on data submitted to MNCM in 2025 and reflecting care delivered in 2024, work in tandem with MNCM’s Performance Hub —an interactive platform providing statewide analyses of health care quality and cost measures. Collectively, these tools equip community partners, including medical groups, payers, policymakers, public health agencies, researchers, and community-based organizations, with actionable insights to drive improvements in care and advance health equity across Minnesota. Report highlights include: Health Care Quality Significant gaps remain in asthma control, with thousands of patients needing improved care to meet statewide benchmarks. Colorectal cancer screening rates for the newly eligible 45-49 age group continues to improve. While the 2024 rate for all age groups has significantly increased compared to 2023, it remains significantly lower than 2021. Childhood immunization continues to show a decrease in statewide rate from year to year. This measure has not shown improvement in rates following the COVID-19 pandemic. There were modest improvements in breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, controlling high blood pressure, diabetes eye exams, and immunizations for adolescents. Health Care Disparities Black, Indigenous, Multi-Race, and Hispanic/Latinx patients experienced the most disparities across multiple measures, particularly in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Patients speaking Somali and Spanish, as well as those from Laos, Mexico, and Somalia, had lower rates of preventive care and chronic disease management compared to statewide averages. Cost and Utilization The total cost of care increased by 7.3% in 2024, primarily driven by an 8.9% rise in pharmacy costs and an 8.3% rise in professional fees. All categories of medical services saw increased use, except for inpatient admissions. Women aged 36-64 had the highest number of claims, while men aged 18-35 had the lowest number of claims. Quality Leaders In 2024, 31 medical groups were recognized as quality leaders across the measures reported by medical groups. In 2024, 58 medical groups were recognized as quality leaders across the measures reported by payers. 
By Elizabeth Cinqueonce March 5, 2026
Aligning for Impact: Minnesota's Health Data Evolution A 2026 Leadership Series from the MNCM Board Chair & President
By Jessica Donovan January 21, 2026
CONNECTED THROUGH DATA: Uncovering Disparities in Cervical Cancer
By Jess Donovan, MPH, BSN October 21, 2025
This October marks the 40th anniversary of Breast Cancer Awareness Month. According to the American Cancer Society, about 1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in their lifetime. Fortunately, however, early detection through screening and advances in treatment have decreased mortality by 44% since 1989. Screening can catch cancer early, when it is… The post Empowered by Data: Uncovering Screening Disparities and Reducing Breast Cancer Risk appeared first on MN Community Measurement.
By Jess Donovan, MPH, BSN September 30, 2025
September is Sexual Health Awareness Month. As we close out September, we’re highlighting two of the measures we report on – Cervical Cancer Screening and Chlamydia Screening in Women.   Cervical cancer, once one of the most common cancers affecting women in the United States, has significantly decreased since the 1970s. The reason for the decline… The post Empowered by Data: Spotlight on Screening for Sexual Health appeared first on MN Community Measurement.

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories